Eksplorasi Engineering and Science Performance Siswa SMP pada Materi Kalor dan Perpindahannya Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui engineering performance and science performance siswa SMP pada materi kalor dan perpindahannya ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan etnografi. Penelitian ini dilakukan sebanyak 4 kali pertemuan dengan partisipan 6 orrang siswa dari salah satu SMP di kabupaten Jember. Data diperoleh dari hasil observasi, dokumentasi, dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Engineering performance siswa laki-laki lebih unggul dibandingkan perempuan, tetapi tidak menunjukkan hasil yang sangat signifikan. Hal ini disebabkan karena siswa laki-laki secara signifikan lebih terlibat dalam kepemimpinan aktif, sebaliknya partisipasi siswa perempuan seringkali berfokus pada bantuan pasif. Selain itu, science performance siswa perempuan lebih mendominasi dibandingkan laki-laki, terlihat cukup signifikan jumlahnya. Perempuan lebih unggul di science performance pada bagian menjelaskan konsep sains kepada anggota kelompoknya, melalukan pencatatan, dan mengarahkan serta lebih berani untuk meminta pendapat dari guru. Sedangkan siswa laki-laki lebih kepada perilaku mengamati aktivitas secara pasif.
Downloads
References
Asante, C. W., Ackah, C. G., & Frimpong, L. K. (2023). Gender diferences in academic performance of students studying Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at the University of Ghana. SN Social Science. 3(12): 1-22.
Bado, B. (2022). Model Pendekatan Kualitatif: Telaah Dalam Metode Penelitian Ilmiah. Klaten: Tahta Media Grup.
Cimpian, J.R., Kim, T.H., & McDermott, Z. T. (2020). Understanding persistent gender gaps in STEM does achievement matter differently for men and woman?. Science. 368(6497): 1317-1319.
Dah, E. M. (2020). Assessing Senior High School biology students’ science process skilss. University of Cape Coast.
Eickerman, O., & Rifkin, M. (2020). The elephant in the (physics class) room: discussing gender inequality in our class. The Physics Teacher. 58(301): 300-305.
Fransiska, L., Subagia, I. W., & Sarini, P. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran guided discovery terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa SMP Negeri 3 Sukasada. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSSI). 1(2): 68-79.
Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang., M.T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: a mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 55(2): 1-28.
Han, F. (2019). Self-concept and achievement in math among Australian primary students: gender and culture issues. Frontiers in Psychology. 10(603): 1-9.
Hasasiyah, S. H., Hutomo, B. A., Subali, B., & Marwoto, P. (2020). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMP pada materi sirkulasi darah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 6(1): 5-9.
Hernawati, D., Amin, M., Irawati, M., Indriwati, S., & Aziz, M. (2018). Integration of project activity to enhance the scientific process skill and self efficacy in zoology of vertebrate teaching and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 14(6): 2475-2485.
Jovanovic, J & King, S. S. (2016). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: who's doing the performing?. American Educational Research Journal. 35(3): 477- 496.
Kurnia, A., Sukarmin & Sunarno, W. (2021). Pola kemampuan berpikir kreatif ditinjau dari gender siswa sekolah menengah dalam pembelajaran IPA. Risenologi. 6-10.
Kurniawan, Z. Y., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., Mugijatna & Habsari, S. K. (2018). Gender bias in the workplace: Should woman be marginalized in engineering job?. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 306(1).
Mingoa, J. I & Abocejo, F.T. (2021). Science performance and scholastic aptitude of grade 9 learners. European Journal of Education Studies. 8(3): 342-358
Mujahida & Rus’an. (2019). Analisis perbandingan teacher centered dan learner centered. Journal of Pendagogy. 2(2):323-331.
Mulyo., Sari, M. R. G. T., Fatwa, A., & Azhar, S. (2019). Proses berpikir siswa bergaya kognitif visualizer dalam menyelesaikan masalah TIMSS non geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 8(1): 167-178.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 7(1): 54-65.
Nurhayati, Y., & Nurhayati, E. (2018). Psikologi Komunikasi Antar Gender. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018. PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations. PISA-OECD Publishing.
Putra, P.D.A., Sulaeman, N, F., Lesmono, A. D., Kumano, Y., & Fadzil, H. B. M. (2023). Gender roles in engineering design process activity: a small group exploration trough collaborative argumentation. Kasersart Journal of Social Science. 44: 241-247.
Prasetiyo, A. (2018). Subordination of Javanese women. Advances in social science, education and humanities. (280): 34-38.
Pritasari,A.C., Dwiastuti, S., & Probosari, R.M. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Argumentasi melalui Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning pada Siswa Kelas X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 8(1): 1-71.
Safitri, N. S., Djudin, T., & Trisianawati, E. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi kalor dan perpindahannya di kelas VII SMP 5 Sungai Kakap. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Aplikasinya. 3(1): 1-6.
Sari, R. T., & Jusar, I. R. (2018). Analysis of science learning process by using learning module of character education oriented through quantum learning approach. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA. 4(1) 14-24.
Shin, S., Rachmatullah, A., Rosyayanti, F., Ha, M., & Lee, J. (2018). Career motivation of secondary students in STEM: a cross-cultural study between Korea and Indonesia. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance. 18: 203-231.
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Nite, S. (2023). Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 18(2): 1-8.
Su, J., Yang, W., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on children’s use of robotics in early childhood education: a systematic review. Early Education and Davelopment. 1-14.
Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A.., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y., & Kumano, Y. (2021). Exploring student engagement in STEM education through the engineering design process. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA. 7(1): 1-16.
Sunyono. (2018). Science process skills characteristics of junior high school studens in lampung. European Scientific journal. 14(10): 32-45.
Wieselmann. J. R., Roehrig, G. H., & Kim, J. N. (2020). Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls' attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM. Wiley SSMA. 120: 233-244.
Wieselmann, J. R., Dare, E. A., Ring-whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). "I just do what the boys tell me": Exploring small group student interaction in an integrated STEM unit. JRST WILEY. 1-33.
Wulandari, A. (2022). Pergeseran pembelajaran berbasis student centered learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. 1(1): 1-5.
Zahra. M., Wati, W., & Makbuloh, D. (2019). Pembelajaran SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, Society): pengaruhnya pada keterampilan Proses Sains. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2(3): 320-327.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JLPF (Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika) is an Open Access Journal. JLPF allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retain the publishing rights. The authors who publish the manuscript in this journal agree to the following terms:
Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika by Physics Education Program, Universitas Mulawarman is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to:
1. Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
1. Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
.png)
