Peer Review Process

Overview

Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF) applies a double-blind peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, relevance, and academic integrity of manuscripts submitted for publication.

All manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening before being sent for peer review. Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's requirements may be rejected at the initial screening stage.

1
Submission and Initial Screening

Manuscripts submitted to JLPF must be original works of the authors, must not have been published previously in another journal, and must not be under consideration or assessment by another journal.

2
Scope and Formatting Check

The Editor checks whether the submitted manuscript complies with:

  1. the focus and scope of JLPF, particularly in the fields of Physics Education and Physics; and
  2. the journal's guidelines for article preparation and submission.

Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements may be rejected during the initial editorial screening.

3
Plagiarism Screening

Manuscripts are screened for plagiarism and substantial textual similarity using Turnitin.

If significant plagiarism or substantial textual similarity is identified, the manuscript may be returned to the author for correction before proceeding to the peer-review stage.

Authors are strongly encouraged to conduct their own plagiarism or similarity check before submitting their manuscripts to JLPF.

4
Reviewer Assignment

Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are assigned to appropriate experts whose expertise is relevant to the subject and content of the manuscript.

Minimum number of reviewers: 2 expert reviewers
5
Double-Blind Peer Review

Manuscripts are reviewed through a double-blind peer-review process by a minimum of two expert reviewers.

The identities of the authors are concealed from the reviewers, and the identities of the reviewers are concealed from the authors throughout the review process.

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on their relevance, originality, scientific quality, methodological rigor, clarity, and potential contribution to the fields covered by JLPF.

6
Editorial Decision

The Editor makes the editorial decision based on the reviewers' evaluations and recommendations, the quality of the manuscript, and the results of the plagiarism screening.

The possible editorial decisions are:

Reject
Major Revision
Minor Revision
Accept

The editorial decision is communicated to the author together with the relevant reviewer comments and editorial recommendations.

7
Publication of Accepted Articles

Accepted manuscripts are scheduled for publication by the Editor-in-Chief. The publication order may consider the recency of the research issue, the order of the date received, and the geographical distribution of the authors.

Peer Review at a Glance

Initial Screening Editor
Plagiarism Screening Turnitin
Review Model Double-blind peer review
Minimum Reviewers 2 expert reviewers
Final Decision Editor
Possible Outcomes Reject, Major Revision, Minor Revision, Accept
Confidentiality

Manuscripts submitted to JLPF and the peer-review process are treated as confidential. Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts and review-related information throughout the editorial process.