Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 19, 2019
Published
Jul 31, 2017
Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 252

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the Malay proficiency among students in Form Two especially non-Malay students and its relationship to academic achievement History. To achieve the purpose of the study there are two objectives, the first is to look at the difference between mean of Malay Language test influences min of academic achievement of History subject among non-Malay students in Form Two and the second is the relationship between the level of Malay proficiency and their academic achievement for History. This study used quantitative methods, which involved 100 people of Form Two non-Malay students in one of the schools in Klang, Selangor. This study used quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical inference with IBM SPSS Statistics v22 software. This study found that there was a relationship between the proficiency of Malay language among non-Malay students with achievements in the subject of History. The implications of this study are discussed in this article.
 

Keywords

The Malay proficiency academic achievement of History subject

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Noordin, N. binti, Ahmad, A. R., & Ahmad, A. (2017). Learning Language Levels in Students Accurate with a History Academic Achievement History . Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 1(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.30872/yupa.v1i2.98

References

  1. Adz. Jamros Bin Jamali. 2014. Penggunaan Media Visual Berdasarkan Model ASSURE untuk meningkatkan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Sejarah di Peringkat Sekolah Menengah. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  2. Aini Hassan. 1998. Sejarah dalam Sistem Pendidikan Malaysia. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan dalam Simposium Sejarah. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya: 30-31 Oktober.
  3. Anuar Ahmad & Nelson Jinggan. 2015. Pengaruh Kompetensi Kemahiran Guru dalam Pengajaran terhadap Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar dalam Mata Pelajaran Sejarah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik 3: 1-11.
  4. Anuar Ahmad, Siti Haishah Abd Rahman & Nur Atiqah T. Abdullah. 2009. Tahap keupayaan pengajaran guru Sejarah dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian murid di sekolah berprestasi rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 34 (I): 53-66.
  5. Barbara Watson Andaya & Leonard Y. Andaya. 1983. Sejarah Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Macmillan Publishers (M) Sdn. Bhd.
  6. Berita Harian. 15 Ogos 2005.
  7. Hamzah Sulaiman. 2006. Hubungan Faktor-faktor dengan penguasaan Bahasa Melayu Pelajar Tingkatan Empat: Satu Tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seri Desa. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
  8. M. Anadan A/L Manikam. 2011. Kesan pendekatan kontekstual terhadap sikap dan pencapaian pelajar tingkatan dua dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  9. Maharom Mahmood. 1998. Analisis kemahiran Pemikiran Sejarah dalam bahan kurikulum peringkat menengah rendah. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakult Pendidikan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  10. Mohd Mahzan Awang, Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Mohd Muhaimi Abdul Rahman. 2014. Penggunaan peta minda oleh pelajar pintar cerdas dalam pembelajaran Sejarah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 39 (2): 95-100.
  11. Robiah Sidin. 2007. ICT dalam Pendidikan: Prospek dan Cabaran dalam Pembaharuan Pedagogi. Jurnal Pendidikan: 139-152.
  12. Rosy Talin. 2014. The Teaching of History in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 2:72-78.
  13. Subardah Nair & Malar A/P Muthiah. 2005. Penggunaan Model Konstruktivisme Lima Fasa NEEDHAM dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan (20): 21-41.
  14. Utusan Malaysia. 19 Oktober 2010. Yong Shu Lan. 2013. Gabungan Pendekatan Konstraktivisme dan Behavioralisme bagi Meningkatan Prestasi Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Tingkatan Tiga. Seminar Pendidikan Sejarah dan Geografi 2013, UMS 29-30 Ogos 2013: 133-156.