Science and Engineering Practices Elements on Physics Textbook: A Comparison Between Indonesia and Malaysia

Authors

  • Alya Puspita Zahra Physics Education Study Program, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Dian Rachel Pasaribu Physics Education Study Program, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman Physics Education Study Program, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Pramudiya Dwi Aristya Putra Science Education, University of Jember, Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v6i2.4373

Keywords:

STEM, Science and Engineering Practice, Physics Textbook

Abstract

Many countries are revitalizing science subjects by strengthening the integration of science content with engineering, technology, and mathematics content and skills, creating STEM learning. However, the availability of textbooks capable of facilitating this integration remains limited. This study aims to analyze the Science and Engineering Practice content in high school physics textbooks used by Indonesian and Malaysian schools. This study is qualitative descriptive research with content analysis. The analysis was conducted on two samples of Indonesian and Malaysian books each. Content analysis is based on the SEPAR (Science and Engineering Practice Assessment Rubric) that divides Science and Engineering Practice into 8 elements. The analysis showed that Indonesian textbooks' Science and Engineering Practice content is still lacking compared to Malaysian books in all elements. The most common aspects found in Indonesian books are asking questions and defining problems. These results show that Malaysian high school physics textbooks represent many elements of Science and Engineering Practices, but there are still several elements that are not optimal. This research highlights the importance of improving the representation of  Science and Engineering Practice in Physics textbook.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd, M., Bunyamin, H., Talib, C. A., Ahmad, N. J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Surif, J. (2020). Current Teaching Practice of Physics Teachers and Implications for Integrated STEM Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081903

Abdulwahed, M., & Hasna, M. O. (2017). The role of engineering design in technological and 21st century competencies capacity building: Comparative case study in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040520

Amalia, R., Wisutama, R. A., Sulaeman, N. F., & Qadar, R. (2023). Investigating STEM Career Content in Indonesian Science Junior High School Textbooks. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9207

Anagün, Ş. S. (2018). Teachers ’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st Century Skills and Managing Constructivist Learning Environments. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825–840. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191700

Aryati, L., Pujiastuti, H., & Sudiana, R. (2020). Development of Learning Media with the STEM Approach on Materials of Sequences and Series. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(148), 91–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v10i2.6400

Asikin, M., Nurhidayat, M. F., & Ardiansyah, A. S. (2021). Development of STEM-nuanced textbook to improve students’ mathematical communication skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042064

Choy, S. C., Chuan, K. K., Beng, O. H., Md Mustafa, M. K. A., & Ragavan, R. (2019). Buku Fizik Tingkatan 4 Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia Kurikulum Standar Sekolah Menengah (K. Thangarajan (ed.)). Pustaka Sarjana SDN BHD.

Farland-Smith, D. (2009). How does culture shape students’ perceptions of scientists? Cross-national comparative study of American and Chinese elementary students. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03182355

Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM Education Implementation in Indonesia: A Scoping Review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2

Fuadah, S. F., Patonah, S., & Nuroso, H. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Keterampilan Komunikasi Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v8i2.1630

Hirsch, L. S., Berliner-Heyman, S., & Cusack, J. L. (2017). Introducing middle school students to engineering principles and the engineering design process through an academic summer program. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 398–407.

Nurhaddi, R. P., & Budiyanto, M. (2020). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Berbasis High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Untuk Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Pinsa E-Journal: Pendidikan Sains, 8(3), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.26740/pensa.v8i3.38403

Nurhayati, N., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2016). Pola Penalaran Ilmiah dan Kemampuan Penyelesaian Masalah Sintesis Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(8), 1594–1597. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i8.6674

Nuryadin, A., Arya Wisutama, R., Fitriyah Sulaeman, N., Subagiyo, L., & Marzan, J.-N. T. (2024). Argumentation Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers: An Exploration During a STEM Project in Water Turbidity. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 12(2), 264–278. http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/JPSI/indexhttps://dx.doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i2.35651

Papakonstantinou, M., & Skoumios, M. (2021). Science and engineering practices in the content of Greek middle school physics textbooks about forces and motion. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 457. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1286

Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., & Nugroho, O. F. (2021). STEM Education in Indonesia : Science Teachers ’ and Students ’ Perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i1.24

Pisano, R. (2025). A History of Physics: Phenomena, Ideas and Mechanism. Springer.

Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Supeno, & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Exploring Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using the Engineering Design Process in a Physics Classroom. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3

Sakata, S., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Attempting STEM Education in Informal Japanese Educational Facilities Through the Theme of " Sand ". K-12 STEM Education, 4(4), 401–411.

Sengupta-Irving, T., & Agarwal, P. (2017). Conceptualizing Perseverance in Problem Solving as Collective Enterprise. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19, 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2017.1295417

Sulaeman, N. F., Efwinda, S., & Putra, P. D. A. (2022). Teacher Readiness in STEM Education: Voices of Indonesian Physics Teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1191

Sunardi, Probowening, P. R., & Darmawan, A. B. (2016). Buku Siswa Fisika Kelompok Peminatan Matematika dan Ilmu-Ilmu Alam untuk Siswa SMA/MA Kelas 10 Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi 2016. Yrama Widya.

Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & Koes, S. (2016). STEM: apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM (Vol. 1, pp. 976–984).

Winarni, P. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Dasar IPA Fisika Secara Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.32585/jkp.v5i1.1076

Zhou, L. (2024). Infusing the Engineer Design Process into Education. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 23(2), 3725–3727. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.co335

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Zahra, A. P., Pasaribu, D. R. ., Sulaeman, N. F. ., & Putra, P. D. A. . (2025). Science and Engineering Practices Elements on Physics Textbook: A Comparison Between Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 6(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v6i2.4373

Issue

Section

Articles