Main Article Content


This research and development aim to generate a hybrid learning model by incorporating SIPEJAR UM content. This collaboration aims to foster innovation and adaptation to the changing times and the digitalization era in education. The hybrid learning model, implemented in the History Education Research course, combines face-to-face and online learning. This approach enables a blended learning process that combines the advantages of both methods. The research method utilized in this research and development study is the Dick and Carey model. The data for this article was gathered through observations, interviews, and questionnaires distribution to students and lecturers. The outcome of this research and development study is a collaborative hybrid learning model that incorporates SIPEJAR UM through the provision of learning content in the History Education Research course.


Hybrid Learning SIPEJAR Historical Education Research Content

Article Details

How to Cite
Sulistyo, W. D., & Pratama, R. (2023). Hybrid Learning Model Through SIPEJAR Content as Learning Innovation in History Education Research Courses. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 7(2), 102-113.


  1. Alessi and Trollip. 2001. Multimedia for learning: methods and development, 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Aslam, F., Aimin,W., Li, M., and Rehman, K.U. 2020. Innovation in the Era of Iot and Insdustry 5.0: Absolute Innovation Managemenet (AIM) Framework. Journal Information, Volume 11 (2).
  3. Bahasoan, A. N, dkk. 2020. Effectiveness of Online Learning in Pandemic Covid-19. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 1(2), 100-106.
  4. Cavanaugh J. M., Giapponi C. C., Golden T. D. 2015. Digital technology and student cognitive development: The neuroscience of the university classroom. Journal of Management Education, 40 (1).
  5. Duncum, P. 2017. Responding to Big Data in the Art Education Classroom: Affordances and Problematics. International Journal of Art & Design Education, Volume 1 (2).
  6. Garrison, D. R, & Vaughan, N. D. 2008. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework Principles and Guidelines. San Fransisco. Joyes. Bass.
  7. Gay, L.R., G.E. Miils. 2006. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. USA: Pearson.
  8. Hidayah S N. 2019. Hybrid Model-Based Learning in Welcome Era Industrial Revolution 4.0 Innov. Soc. Stud.
  9. Indar Sabria. 2019. Peran Pendidikan Seni Di Era Society 5.0 untuk Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES
  10. Indarto, dkk. 2018. Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning pada Mata Kuliah Sepakbola di Pendidikan Olahraga FKIP UMS. ISBN 978-602-70471-3-6
  11. Nunung Nindigraha, dkk. 2019. Increasing Learning Outcomes of Education Technology Department Students on the Use of Sistem Pengelolaan Pembelajaran (SIPEJAR) Universitas Negeri Malang. International Conference on Educational Technology, International Conference on Educational Technology
  12. Nurhidayat, dkk. 2020. Model Pembelajaran Hybird Learning Pada Matakuliah Sepakbola Di Pendidikan Olahraga FKIP UMS.
  13. Pereira, A.G., Lima, T.M., and Santos. 2020. Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0: Opportunities and Threats. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), Volume 8(5).
  14. Philip E. Bernhardt, 2015. 21st Century Learning: Professional Development in Practice. The Qualitative Report Jurnal, Volume 20 (1).
  15. Rahayu, dkk. 2015. Pengembangan Media Website Hybird Learning Berbasis Kemampuan Literasi Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, Volume 7 (1).
  16. Sa’adun akbar. 2013. Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  17. Sutadji, dkk. 2020. Measuring user experience on SIPEJAR as elearning of Universitas Negeri Malang. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 372.