Editorial Workflow

Yupa: Historical Studies Journal applies a structured editorial workflow to ensure the quality, originality, ethical compliance, and scholarly contribution of every manuscript submitted to the journal.

1
 

Manuscript Submission

Authors submit manuscripts through the online submission system. The manuscript must follow the journal template, author guidelines, reference requirements, and publication ethics.

2
 

Initial Editorial Screening

The editorial team checks the manuscript’s suitability with the journal’s aims and scope, historical focus, title, abstract, keywords, article structure, references, and compliance with the official template.

3
 

Similarity and Plagiarism Check

The manuscript is screened for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and inappropriate text reuse. The maximum allowed similarity score is 20%.

4
 

Double-Blind Peer Review

Eligible manuscripts are reviewed through a double-blind peer-review process. Reviewers evaluate originality, methodology, argumentation, scholarly contribution, and relevance to the field.

5
 

Author Revision

Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments and editorial recommendations within the specified revision deadline.

6
 

Editorial Evaluation and Decision

Editors evaluate the revised manuscript and reviewer recommendations. Decisions may include accepted, minor revision, major revision, or declined.

7
 

Copyediting

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting to improve clarity, consistency, language quality, formatting, citation style, and compliance with the journal template.

8
 

Layout Editing and Proofreading

The manuscript is prepared in the final publication layout. Authors may review proofs before publication to ensure content accuracy.

9

Final Publication

The final article is published online in the assigned issue of Yupa: Historical Studies Journal with complete metadata, DOI, page numbers, and citation information.

Editorial Note

Manuscripts that do not comply with the journal’s aims and scope, manuscript template, language policy, reference requirements, similarity policy, or publication ethics may be returned for correction or declined at any stage of the editorial process.