Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 6, 2022
Accepted
Jul 21, 2022
Published
Aug 10, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 400 Download : 333

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the history and influence of the South China Sea conflict on the political stability of Southeast Asia. The South China Sea has tremendous potential, both in the sea and above the sea. Thus, countries in Southeast Asia and the two major world powers, namely the United States and the People's Republic of China, are trying to claim or at least maintain their influence in the region. This research method uses literature research, and data analysis techniques used use content analysis methods. The findings of this study are that mutual claims between countries in Southeast Asia will become a major conflict in the future if it is not resolved. The negotiations were about the process of resolving conflicts that occurred in the South China Sea in reviewing the problems, and prospects in the South China Sea area for the benefit of all countries.

Keywords

South China Sea multilateral conflict political stability Southeast Asia

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Matondang, S. A., Hardiansyah, M. R., & Nababan, S. A. (2022). History and Effect of South China Sea Conflict on Southeast Asia Political Stability. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 6(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.30872/yupa.v6i1.973

References

  1. Ahmad, M. Z., & Mohd Sani, M. A. (2017). China’s Assertive Posture in Reinforcing its Territorial and Sovereignty Claims in the South China Sea: An Insight into Malaysia’s Stance. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 67–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109916000323
  2. Amboro, K. (2020). Kontekstualisasi Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 3(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.30872/yupa.v3i2.203
  3. Arbar, T. F. (2020, July 25). Klaim China & Harta Karun Migas di Laut China Selatan. CNBCIndonesia.Com. Retrieved from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200724145935-4-175189/klaim-china-harta-karun-migas-di-laut-china-selatan
  4. Ariyanti. (2021, May 28). Kinerja KKP Dipertanyakan Imbas Revisi UU Landas Kontinen. Trustnews.Id. Retrieved from https://m.trustnews.id/read/1208/Kinerja-KKP-Dipertanyakan-Imbas-Revisi-UU-Landas-Kontinen
  5. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
  6. Bagus Dharma Agastia, I. G., & Agung Banyu Perwita, A. (2016). Indonesia’s Maritime Axis and the Security of Sea Lanes of Communications (SLOCs) in the Indo-Pacific. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 5(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.2016.0081.10-21
  7. Beckman, R. (2013). The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0142
  8. Carley, K. (1993). Coding Choices for Textual Analysis: A Comparison of Content Analysis and Map Analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/271007
  9. Citradi, T. (2020, July 3). Ada Harta Karun Apa yang Diperebutkan di Laut China Selatan? CNBCIndonesia.Com. Retrieved from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200703144957-4-170032/ada-harta-karun-apa-yang-diperebutkan-di-laut-china-selatan
  10. Darmawan, A. B., & Mahendra, Lady. (2018). Isu Laut Tiongkok Selatan: Negara-negara ASEAN Terbelah Menghadapi Tiongkok. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 12(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.12.1.2018.79-100
  11. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. SAGE Open, 4(1), 215824401452263. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
  12. Ferhat, S. (2006). China-Taiwan: Young People Confront Their History. China Perspectives, 2006(4). https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.1038
  13. Fujitani, J. (2016). The Ming Rejection of the Portuguese Embassy of 1517: A Reassessment. Journal of World History, 27(1), 87–102. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43901825
  14. Gao, Z., & Jia, B. B. (2013). The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098
  15. Gonzales, R. E. (2014). THE SPRATLY ISLANDS DISPUTE: INTERNATIONAL LAW, CONFLICTING CLAIMS, AND ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORKS FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (University of Nevada, Las Vegas). University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=award
  16. Granados, U. (2008). JAPANESE EXPANSION INTO THE SOUTH CHINA SEA: COLONIZATION AND CONFLICT, 1902—1939. Journal of Asian History, 42(2), 117–142. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41933494
  17. Gunawan, A. S., & Siregar, I. (2021). Peranan Pemerintahan Indonesia Dalam Menjaga Keutuhan Wilayah Maritim NKRI Dalam Konflik Laut Cina Selatan. Jurnal Sejarah & Pendidikan Sejarah FKIP Universitas Jambi, 1(1), 95–108. Retrieved from https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jejak/article/view/13852/11522
  18. Herlina, H. (2014). ISLAM DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PERADABAN MELAYU. Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sastra Islam, 14(2), 57–78. Retrieved from http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/tamaddun/article/view/132
  19. Junef, M. (2018). Sengketa Wilayah Maritim di Laut Tiongkok Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.219-240
  20. Kim, J. (2015). Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9(2), 107–141. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26271078
  21. Lan, T. J. (2018). Chinese Indonesians and China-Indonesia Relations: a Juxtaposition of Identity and Politics. Masyarakat Indonesia, 43(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v43i2.738
  22. Macaraig, C. E., & Fenton, A. J. (2021). Analyzing the Causes and Effects of the South China Sea Dispute. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 8(2), 42–58. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/48617340
  23. Narine, S. (1998). ASEAN and the Management of Regional Security. Pacific Affairs, 71(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2760976
  24. Novelin, T., & Setiabudhi, I. K. R. (2018). ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL MENGENAI PERMASALAHAN LAUT CINA SELATAN. Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3). Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/40630
  25. Novitasari, C. N. (2021). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Internasional dalam Kasus Sengketa Indonesia-Malaysia Mengenai Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan. Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 2(4), 231–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/the digest.v2i2.48638
  26. Nugroho, M. A. A., & Hikam, M. M. (2021). SOUTH CHINA SEA CLAIM DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BETWEEN ASEAN AND CHINA. Trunojoyo Law Review, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v2i1.9478
  27. Patalano, A. (2015). Feigning grand strategy. In The Cambridge History of the Second World War (pp. 159–188). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139855969.009
  28. Paul, T. (2019). When balance of power meets globalization: China, India and the small states of South Asia. Politics, 39(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718779930
  29. Pertiwi, M. (2021). Perkembangan Sentimen anti-Tionghoa di Indonesia. KAGANGA KOMUNIKA: Journal of Communication Science, 3(1), 82–93. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.uts.ac.id/index.php/KAGANGA/article/view/1062
  30. Putra, P. (2016). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LAUT CINA SELATAN MENURUT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL SESUAI DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL TAHUN 2016 (Universitas Sumatera Utara). Universitas Sumatera Utara. Retrieved from https://repositori.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/4464/130200525.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  31. Qiu, J. (2017). South China Sea: the gateway to China’s deep-sea ambitions. National Science Review, 4(4), 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx107
  32. Radityo, F., Rara, G., Amelia, I., & Efraim, R. (2019). GEOPOLITIK TIONGKOK DI KAWASAN ASIA TENGGARA: JALUR PERDAGANGAN (OBOR). Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 3(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v3i1.1073
  33. Ramli, R. P., Lumumba, P., & Burhanuddin. (2021). Sengketa Republik Indonesia – Republik Rakyat Tiongkok di Perairan Natuna. Hasanuddin Journal of International Affairs, 1(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31947/hjirs.v1i1.12737
  34. Roach, J. A. (2014). Malaysia and Brunei: An Analysis of their Claims in the South China Sea. CNA Analysis & Solutions, (August). Retrieved from http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/naval63§ion=7
  35. Rowan, J. P. (2005). The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey, 45(3), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2005.45.3.414
  36. Roza, R., Nainggolan, P. P., & Muhamad, S. V. (2013). KONFLIK LAUT CHINA SELATAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KAWASAN (P. P. Nainggolan, Ed.). Jakarta: P3DI Setjen DPR Republik Indonesia dan Azza Grafika.
  37. Sanjaya, J. B. (2021). Analisis Mengenai Kesepakatan Negara Indonesia Dalam Memutusakan Penyelesaian Kasus Sipadan Dan Ligitan Melalui Mahkamah Internasional. Jurnal Analisis Hukum (JAH), 4(1), 98–119. Retrieved from https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/JAH/article/view/2968
  38. Schubert, G. (2010). The Political Thinking of the Mainland Taishang: Some Preliminary Observations from the Field. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(1), 73–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261003900104
  39. Sinaga, L. C. (2016). China’s Assertive Foreign Policy in South China Sea Under Xi Jinping: Its Impact on United States and Australian Foreign Policy. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 3(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v3i2.770
  40. Sobarini, E., Amalia, F. S., Nurmala, M., Syukur, M. A., & Wisesa, R. G. (2021). Diplomasi Pertahanan Malaysia di Laut China Selatan: Isu dan Tantangan (Malaysia’s Defense Diplomacy in the South China Sea: Issues and Challenges). Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 7(2), 13–38. Retrieved from https://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DP/article/view/725
  41. Steffens, A. W. (2013). Scramble in the South China Sea. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 7(3), 88–107. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26270587
  42. Suharna, K. (2012). Konflik dan Solusi Laut Tiongkok Selatan dan Dampaknya bagi Ketahanan Nasional. Majalah TANNAS, pp. 36–37.
  43. Usman, A., & Sukma, R. (1997). Konflik Laut Cina Selatan: tantangan bagi Asean. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
  44. Usuki, E. (2018). Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 21 (2015). In S. Lee & H. E. Lee (Eds.), Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 21 (2015). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004344556
  45. Veronika, N. W. (2010). Pengaruh Komponen Geopolitik Terhadap Konflik di Laut Tiongkok Selatan antara Tiongkok dan Vietnam pada periode 2009-2011 (Universitas Indonesia). Universitas Indonesia. Retrieved from https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20304929-T30893-Nuri Widiastuti Veronika.pdf
  46. Wirajuda, H. (2017). “KASUS SIPADAN-LIGITAN: MASALAH PENGISIAN KONSEP NEGARA” PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PULAU SIPADAN DAN PULAU LIGITAN. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 33(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol33.no1.1363
  47. Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  48. Zuhri, A. S., & Hanifa, H. (2017). THE INFLUENCE OF THE STRATEGIC POSITION OF INDONESIA IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA TOWARD THE MILITARY PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN INDONESIA AND CHINA IN 2010-2015. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v7i1.75

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'