Main Article Content

Abstract

Artikel ini memiliki tujuan untuk mendeskripsikan mengenai kemampuan representasi matematis dengan memanfaatkan pendekatan SPUR. Penelitian dengan metode literature review berdasarkan kajian penelitian-penelitian terdahulu yang relevan mengenai kemampuan representasi matematis juga pendekatan SPUR. Dikaji dan diseleksi beberapa artikel yang diperoleh dari pencarian melalui aplikasi Publish or Perish 7. Adapun banyak artikel yang dikaji yaitu 13 artikel yang bersumber dari jurnal nasional maupun jurnal internasional. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa melalui pendekatan SPUR dapat meningkatkan dan melatih siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Salah satu kemampuan yang siswa harus miliki adalah kemampuan representasi matematis, agar dengan mudah mempresentasikan solusi dari suatu masalah.

Keywords

Representasi Matematis Pendekatan SPUR Pendidikan Matematika

Article Details

How to Cite
Hadijah, H., Waluya, S. B., & Mastur, Z. (2021). Literatur Review: Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Melalui Pendekatan SPUR Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Primatika : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v10i2.606

References

  1. Desfitri, R., & Vermana, L. (2019). Identifying teachers’ approach in assessing students’ understanding on derivative: SPUR perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042114
  2. Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., Thompson, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013.
  3. Fitrianna, A. Y., Dinia, S., Mayasari, M., & Nurhafifah, A. Y. (2018). Mathematical Representation Ability of Senior High School Students: An Evaluation from Students’ Mathematical Disposition. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 3(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5872.
  4. Hoogland, K., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., Pepin, B. E. U., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58(November 2017), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.004.
  5. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 191–212.
  6. Li, Y., Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Deng, Z., Zhu, X., & Yan, S. (2018). Children’s non-symbolic and symbolic numerical representations and their associations with mathematical ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JUN), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01035.
  7. Maulyda, M. A., Hidayanto, E., & Rahardjo, S. (2019). Representation of Trigonometry Graph Funcsion Colage Students Using GeoGebra. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4.
  8. Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E. E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical understanding and representation ability of public junior high school in North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2816.43-56.
  9. Nayir, Ö. Y., Erhan, G. K., Koştur, M., Türkoğlu, H., & Mirasyedioğlu, Ş. (2018). Investigating the readiness of students in primary teacher education program through verbal, model, and mathematical representations of number sets. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 249–282. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.331798.
  10. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America : The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  11. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. PISA : OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisaproducts/PISA 2012 framework e-book_final.pdf.
  12. Ott, N., Brünken, R., Vogel, M., & Malone, S. (2018). Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. Learning and Instruction, 58(December 2016), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.010.
  13. Riyandiarto, B. B., Hidayah, I., & Artikel, I. (2015). Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research ANALISIS PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP DENGAN PENDEKATAN MULTIDIMENSI SPUR ( SKILLS , PROPERTIES , USES , DAN REPRESENTATIONS Abstrak. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(1), 1–9. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer%0AANALISIS.
  14. Sahendra, A., Budiarto, M. T., & Fuad, Y. (2018). Students' Representation in Mathematical Word Problem-Solving: Exploring Students’ Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012059.
  15. Septian, A., Darhim, & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Mathematical representation ability through geogebra-assisted project-based learning models. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012019.
  16. Setiasih, E., Asikin, M., & Mariani, S. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Melalui Strategi REACT Berpendekatan SPUR. Prosiding Seminar …, 2015. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/download/344/365.
  17. Siti Mawaddah, & Anisah, H. (2015). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Generatif (Generatif Learning) di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.