Literasi matematika siswa SMP Negeri Makassar ditinjau dari domain proses, konten, dan konteks PISA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v14i2.6127Keywords:
Literasi matematika, PISA, Proses, Konten, KonteksAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP Negeri di Kota Makassar berdasarkan tiga domain literasi matematika PISA, yaitu proses, konten, dan konteks. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan survei kuantitatif pada 12 SMP Negeri yang dipilih melalui stratified random sampling berdasarkan level sekolah. Instrumen penelitian berupa 12 butir soal uraian literasi matematika yang telah divalidasi dan memiliki reliabilitas Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,812. Data dianalisis menggunakan estimasi interval untuk menentukan rata-rata kemampuan literasi matematika populasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan literasi matematika siswa secara umum berada pada kategori rendah dengan estimasi interval 7,16–8,18 dari skor maksimal 24. Pada domain proses, formulate dan interpret berada pada kategori rendah, sedangkan employ berada pada kategori sedang. Pada domain konten, Change & Relationship dan Space & Shape merupakan konten dengan kategori rendah. Pada domain konteks, scientific menjadi konteks dengan kategori terendah. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa siswa masih mengalami kesulitan dalam merumuskan masalah kontekstual, memahami struktur matematika, dan menafsirkan solusi ke dalam situasi nyata. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya pembelajaran yang lebih menekankan pemodelan matematika, pemberian soal kontekstual yang variatif, serta penguatan materi geometri dan fungsi berdasarkan situasi kehidupan sehari-hari.
Downloads
References
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2011). Essentials of statistics for business and economics, 6th ed. Cengage Learning.
Botha, H., & Van Putten, S. (2018). How Mathematical Literacy Teachers Facilitate Mathematisation in Modelling Situations. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1437337
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, Fourth Indian edition. PHI Learning Private Limited.
Harisman, Y., Dwina, F., Suherman, S., Syaputra, H., & Hafizatunnisa, H. (2025). Designing effective digital learning tools and teaching materials based on students’ mathematical literacy behavior. Infinity Journal, 14(4), 919–948. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i4.p919-948
Hattori, Y., Hiroto, F., & Takuya, B. (2021). Development of Socio-Critically Open-Ended Problems for Critical Mathematical Literacy. The Korean Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics - Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 31(3), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2021.31.3.357
Mahdiansyah, M., & Rahmawati, R. (2014). Literasi matematika siswa pendidikan menengah: Analisis menggunakan desain tes internasional dengan konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 452–469.
OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 Results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014): Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1).
Pusat Data dan Statistik Pendidikan. (2016). Tabel Statistik Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) [Dataset]. http://statistik.data.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/page/smp
Retnawati, H., Kardanova, E., Sumaryanto, S., Prasojo, L. D., Jailani, J., Arliani, E., Hidayati, K., Susanti, M., Lestari, H. P., Apino, E., Rafi, I., Rosyada, M. N., Tuanaya, R., Dewanti, S. R., Sotlikova, R., & Kassymova, G. K. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Use of Technology in Educational Assessment Practices: Lesson Learned and Direction for Future Studies. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems, 4(4), 1656–1693. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i4.1572
Rusdiana, R., Samsuddin, A. F., Muhtadin, A., & Fendiyanto, P. (2023). Development of Mathematical Literacy Problems using East Kalimantan Context. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1885
Stacey, K. (2015). The International Assessment of Mathematical Literacy: PISA 2012 Framework and Items. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 771–790. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43
Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (Eds.). (2015). Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7
Süzen, C., & Kula Ünver, S. (2025). The relationship between middle school students mathematical literacy, geometry achievement, and Van Hiele geometric thinking levels. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(4), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202537039
Tashtoush, M., Qasimi, A., Sheerawi, N., & AL-Shannaq, M. (2024). The Effect of PISA-Based Educational Program on Mathematical Achievement. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 53, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2024.53.13
Zahrah, M. (2024). Penelitian Literasi Matematis di Sekolah: Pengertian dan Kesulitan-Kesulitan Siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 6(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v6i1.29024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Auliaul Fitrah Samsuddin, Heri Retnawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Primatika : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika applies the license of CC BY-SA 4.0 (a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 International License). This license allows authors to keep ownership of the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work. The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. For more information, please see Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 International License.









