Exploring preferred math learning tools for pre-service teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v13i2.4121Keywords:
Math, Pre-service Teachers, Preferences, Learning Tools, GenderAbstract
Pre-service teachers play an important role in teaching and influencing future learners. One of the important skills that prospective teachers must have is mathematical ability, so information about pre-service teachers' learning tool preferences in understanding mathematical concepts is crucial. This study aims to identify pre-service teachers' learning tool preferences for understanding mathematical concepts. This study used mixed methods, quantitative and qualitative. Data collection was carried out by distributing questionnaires to 129 prospective teachers from mathematics and science education study programs, as well as elementary school teacher education at Mulawarman University. Quantitative questions used Likert scale-type questions, and qualitative used free-response questions to get an in-depth analysis. The results of this study showed a very weak correlation between learning aid preferences and the understanding of basic math concepts, but it increased considerably when linked to advanced math concepts. In addition, there is a difference in preference between male and female pre-service teachers, where males are more likely to favor tools such as AI or ChatGPT, while females prefer learning videos. This study is expected to provide valuable information for policymakers to provide facilities that support the learning needs of pre-service teachers.
Downloads
References
Alafnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an Educational Tool: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Communication, Business Writing, and Composition Courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
Alqahtani, E. T., & Abdelrahman, O. N. B. (2014). Effectiveness of Using YouTube on Enhancing EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension Skills. [Thesis, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibin Saud Islamic University].
Amin, A. K. (2015). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbentuk Aplikasi Android Berbasis WEBLOG Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320237784
Amin, M. S. (2018). Perbedaan Struktur Otak dan Perilaku Belajar Antara Pria dan Wanita; Eksplanasi dalam Sudut Pandang Neuro Sains dan Filsafat. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i1.13973
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 52(7), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Boyd, W., Foster, A., Smith, J., & Boyd, W. E. (2014). Feeling Good about Teaching Mathematics: Addressing Anxiety amongst Pre-Service Teachers. Creative Education, 05(04), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.54030
Bravo, E., Amante, B., Simo, P., & Enache, M. (2011). Video as a Teaching Tool to Increase Student Motivation. Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 638–643. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773205
Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). The Effect of Context-Based Video Instruction on Learning and Motivation in Online Courses. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1904_3
Cummins, L., & Asempapa, B. (2013). Fostering teacher candidate dispositions in teacher education programs. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(3).
Diantama, S. (2023). Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelegent (AI) Dalam Dunia Pendidikan, 1 (1).
Dilzhan, B. (2024). Teaching English and Artificial Intelligence: EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Use of ChatGPT. [Thesis, University of Southern Denmark] https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fwy92
Dorji, C. (2023). Effectiveness of Using Youtube Videos in Mathematics Classes of Class VI Students. International Journal of All Research Education & Scientific Methods, 11(10):1679-1692.
Efendi, A. (2009). Beberapa Catatan tentang Buku Teks Pelajaran di Sekolah. Insania: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 14(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v14i2.334
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
Fagerland, M. W. (2012). t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies-a paradox of statistical practice? Fagerland BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(78). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-78
Friedman, M. (1940). A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance For The Problem of m Rangkings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1214/AOMS/1177731944
Gibbons, J. D., & Chakraborti, S. (1991). Comparisons of the mann-whitney, student’s t, and alternate t tests for means of normal distributions. Journal of Experimental Education, 59(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1991.10806565
Hollywood, N. B. (2014). An Examination of Undergraduate Student’s Perceptions and Predilections of the Use of YouTube in the Teaching and Learning Process. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 10, 017–032. https://doi.org/10.28945/1965
Maulana, M. J., & Darmawan, C., & Rahmat. (2023). Penggunaan ChatGPT Dalam Pendidikan Berdasarkan Perspektif Etika Akademik. 10(01), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.36706/jbti.v10i1.21090
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage Publications.
Kalla, D., & Kuraku, S. (2023). Study and Analysis of Chat GPT and its Impact on Different Fields of Study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3), 827-833. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10250455
Kengam, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence In Education. Research Gate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16375.65445
Lynch, J. (2006). Assessing Effects of Technology Usage on Mathematics Learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217441
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On A Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger The Other.
Mardianto, M. F. F., & Prayitno, P. (2020). Peningkatan Hasil Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring saat Pandemi Covid-19 Berdasarkan Media Powerpoint Interaktif. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 5(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v5i2.6119
Milgram, R. J., & Wu, H.-H. (2005). The Key Topics in a Successful Math Curriculum.
Outhwaite, L. A., & Herwegen, J. Van. (2023). Educational apps and learning: Current evidence on design and evaluation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1268–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13360
Putri, N. W. S., & Suryati, N. K. (2016). Modul Statistika dengan SPSS. STMIK STIKOM.
Rahmatika, Yusuf, M., & Agung, L. (2021). The Effectiveness of Youtube as an Online Learning Media. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.33628
Riady, A. (2021). Pendidikan Berkualitas di Era Digital: (Fokus: Aplikasi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran). Jurnal Literasi Digital, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30605/jld.1.2.2021.15
Sarama, J. (2018). Perspectives on the Nature of Mathematics and Research. Plenary Papers, 72–77.
Sholeha, H. H., Pujiastuti, P., & Mardati, A. (2022). Analysis of Mathematical Connection Ability to Students’ Learning Motivation in Advanced Mathematics Courses. Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2065–2074. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.795
Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi siswa pada pelajaran matematika: studi pendahuluan pada siswa yang menyenangi game. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia, 1(1), 224–232.
Songsiengchai, S., Sereerat, B., & Watananimitgul, W. (2023). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students. English Language Teaching, 16(11), 68. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n11p68
Spearman, C. (1904). The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
Tanzimah. (2019). Pemanfaatan Geogebra dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 610–616.
Widiastuti, Y., Winda Lestari, O., & Ambarwati, A. (2022). Preferensi media bacaan sastra siswa SMAN 1 Kraksaan: Cetak atau digital? KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21345
Winarni, S., Kumalasari, A., Marlina, M., & Rohati, R. (2021). Efektivitas Video Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi dan Digital Siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3345
Winkler, R., & Soellner, M. (2018). Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education: A State-Of-The-Art Analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 15903. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.15903abstract
Zhou, L., & Li, J. (2023). The Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation: A Study Based on Self-Determination Theory. Education Science and Management, 1(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.56578/esm010103
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Charlos Falentino, Grecellia Mei Magdalena Dakhi, Anggara Duta Medika, Evanita Mutang, Mohamad Ezra Febryan, Atin Nuryadin, Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Primatika : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika applies the license of CC BY-SA 4.0 (a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 International License). This license allows authors to keep ownership of the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work. The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. For more information, please see Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 International License.
