Stylistic And Political Issues In Donal J Trump’s Tweets

  • Ananda Hardianti Qamara Universitas Mulawarman
  • Sunardi Universitas Mulawarman
  • A.K.Amarullah Universitas Mulawarman
Keywords: Stylistics, Graphological Level, Syntactic Level, Political Issues

Abstract

The study was considered as stylistics analysis because it was purposed to elaborate the features of graphological level and syntactic level that found in Trump’s tweets. In addition, it also discussed about the political issues that raised in his tweets because he was an active user of twitter since his presidency in 2017. This study was conducted at English Department Mulawarman University. The design of this study was qualitative approach which was purposed to classify the tweets into some features of graphological level and syntactic level. It was also used to classify the political issues raised within the tweets. There were found around 368 tweets between November 3rd and December 3rd, 2020. The instruments of the study were the writer herself and the tweets from Trump’s twitter. There were also found some tweets which were not contained the type of the levels and the political issues. Afterward, the data are collected from the tweets and have been triangulated. The first finding of the study indicated the features of graphological level. There were found some features such as full stop, comma, apostrophe, and others. Full stop was the feature of graphological level that was most frequently encountered. It has been detected approximately 614 times within the tweets. Additionally, at the syntactic level, it was discovered that the simple present tense was the most often used tense in the tweets. Trump's tweets contained the feature approximately 220 times. Then, in the following result, it was discovered that election related topics were the most frequently discussed political issues in tweets. During this same period, Trump has tweeted a lot about the electoral landscape. There were around 223 instances of it in the tweets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T., Dobbin, C., & Morten, M. (2019). Border Walls. Stanford University: United States of America.

Aridah, A., Atmowardoyo, H., & Salija, K. (2017). Teacher practices and students' preferences for written corrective feedback and their implications on writing instruction. International Journal Of English Lingusitics, 7(1), 112-125.

Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2004). What Is Morphology. United States: Wiley

Arp, R. T., & Johnson, G. (2006). Perrine’s Literature, Fiction. London: West Group.

Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National Politics on Twitter. Information

Bodgan, R., C. & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative Research For Education: An Introduction To Theory And Methods. Boston: Allyn abd Bacon Inc.

Bradford, R. (1997). Stylistics. London : New York : Routledge.

Chaika, E. (1982). Language the Social Mirror. Massachusets: Newbury House Publisher, Inc.

CNN. (2016, April 13). Trump Family Interviewed by Anderson Cooper at the CNN
Republican Presidential Town Hall. Retrieved November 28, 2017, from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6g_bFgMI5A

Creswell, J., W. 2014. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches : Fourth Edition. Sage Publication, Inc.

Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Cuddon, J. A., Preston, C., J. A. (1999). The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. London: Penguin Books.

Denzin, N., K. (1989) The Research Act : A Theoretical Introduction To Sociological Methods. Third Edition. New York : Prentice Hall.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to Design and Evaluate Research In Education. New York: Mcgraw-Hill

Giles, H., & Powesland, P.F. (1975). Speech Style and Social Evaluation. Oxford, England: Academic Press.

Kalsnes, B. (2016). The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’
Facebook Strategy Versus Practice. Social Media Society,2(2), 1-11.

Keraf, G. (2006). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta : Gramedia Pusaka Utama.

Leech, G. and Short, M. (2007). Style in Fiction (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Longman.

Lodge, K. (2009). A Critical Introduction To Phonetics. London: Bloombsbury Publishing.

Mc Arthur, T. (1998). The English Languages. London: Cambridge University.

Miles, M., B. & Huberman, A., M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. London : Sage Publisher.

Minnite, Lorraine, C. (2018). The Politics of Voter Fraud. Washington D.C: 8th Street SE.
Moore, M. J. Leavy, P. Houtzager and H. White., 1999, 'Polity Qualities: How Governance Affects Poverty'. IDS Working Paper 99. Sussex: Institute Of Development Studies. http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/pvty/pvprp.html.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publication

Rusmawaty, D. (2018). Investigating The Types of Code Switching in Language Teaching Instruction in Efl Class of Sma I Negeri Samarinda. CaLLs (Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics), 4(1), 13-30.

Reaske, C. R. (1966). How to Analyze Poetry. United States: Prentice Hall.

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.

Toye, J. 1999, ‘Nationalising the poverty agenda’, IDS Bulletin, Vol.30, No.2,
van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Context : A Sociocognitive Approach. LONDON: Cambrige University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (1975). Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature. London: Longman.
Published
2021-09-30
How to Cite
Hardianti Qamara, A., Sunardi, & Amarullah, A. (2021). Stylistic And Political Issues In Donal J Trump’s Tweets. E3L: Journal of English Teaching, Linguistic, and Literature , 4(2), 71 - 77. https://doi.org/10.30872/e3l.v4i2.1912
Section
Articles