The TPACK Framework On Teacher’s Classroom Activity at Ma’Had Tahfidzul Qur’an Rahmatullah Samarinda

Authors

  • Wasilatun Abidah Universitas Mulawarman
  • Bibit Suhatmady Universitas Mulawarman
  • Effendi Limbong Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/e3l.v1i2.2028

Keywords:

TPACK framework, English Teacher’s Teaching, Teaching Process

Abstract

Indonesian students who are uninterested in English learning demands English teacher to be more creative and clever to choose an exact way in teaching. One of better ways is integrating various technologies into teacher’s teaching in any content area. In this case, TPACK framework is so needed to create an effective and efficient English teaching and learning that make students interested and motivated. As in MTQ Rahmatullah Samarinda, English teacher uses technology in teaching English. This study proposed 1) to investigate the TPACK being included in teacher’s lesson plan. 2) To analyze how the English teacher implementing TPACK framework in teaching. 3) To compose what problems are faced by teacher in teaching within the TPACK framework. The design of this study was  a qualitative research, a case study. In this study, purposive sampling was chosen. From three classroom observations and one interview, this study revealed three findings: 1) the English teacher applied TPACK framework based on her lesson plan. 2) the English teacher applied TK, CK, PK, and PCK, TPK while did not apply TCK and TPACK based on her classroom observation and document finding. 3) there seven problems were faced by the English teacher in applying TPACK that was include of the difficulties in selecting best technology in efficient time (TK), mastering the topic especially pronunciation mistakes (CK), managing the classroom setting (PK), choosing a good way for receiving teacher’s goal with specific English material (PCK), creating an efficient time by using suitable technology to make students easier to understand and engage them (TCK), utilizing technologies to manage noisy classroom (TPK), and applying various technologies for specific subject content (TPACK). In short, based on the finding it showed that by applying TPACK the teacher required suitable technologies and methods in teaching to encourage students learning English

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, S & Choi, J (2004). Teachers’ subject matter knowledge as a teacher qualification: A Synthesis of the quantitative literature on students’ mathematics achievement. AERA 2004

American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE) Committee on Innovation and technology. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Akyüz, D. (2016). TPACK analysis of preservice teachers under different instruction methods and class levels. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 89-111. doi:10.16949/turcomat.75768

Ashton, P., & Crocker, L. (1987). Systematic study of planned variations: The essential focus of teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 2-8.

Aquino, A. B. (2015). Self-efficacy on technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of biological science pre-service teachers. Asian Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(4.3), 150-157. Retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/b8019779fd70454fa65a74bf559576b5

Bilici, S. C., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251. doi:10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050

Bodgan, R., & Biklen, S.K (1998). Qualitative Research in Education. USA:A Viacom Company.

Brown, H.D (2007). Principles of Language Learning & Teaching. New York: Pearson Education.

Carter, V. G. (1996) Essentials of educational Research (Methodology and design). New York: Meredith Publishing Company.

Chai, Koh, & Tsai, (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 31–51.

Creswell John W (2012). Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. CA: Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).

Dinisari, M, C (2016). SURVEI: Kemampuan Berbahasa Inggris Orang Indonesia Masih Tertinggal. Kabar24. http://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20161209/255/610610/survei-kemampuan-berbahasa-inggris-orang-indonesia-masih-tertinggal

Dita A. P., (2017). Teaching English through TPACK by English Teachers at SMK TI Airlangga Samarinda. Mulawarman University.

Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–110.

Gay, L.R, et al (2006). Educational Research: competencies for analysis and application-8th ed. Person Education,Inc: USA

Graham, C.R., Borup, J., & Smith, N.B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (2012), 28, 530–546

Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & Windridge K.,(2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. The NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire & the Humber.

Harris, J.B & Hofer, M.J (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers' Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related Instructional Planning JRTE | Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 211–229

Harris, J., Grandgenett, N. & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for InformationTechnology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833-3840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Huberman, A.M, and Miles, M.B (2004). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Source Book of a New Method. (2nd Ed). London. SAGE Publication

Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P. & Voogt, J. (2013). TPACK development in teacher design teams: Assessing the teachers’ perceived and observed knoweldge. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Kajornborn, Annabel B. 2001. Using Interviews as research instrument. Unpublished paper. Language, Chulalongkorn university.

Kanuka, H. (2006). Instructional design and e-learning: A discussion of pedagogical content knowledge as a missing construct. The e-journal of instructional Science and Technology, 9(2)

King, L.J (2000). Teaching German literature through the web; Processes and outcomes. Die Unterrichspaxis, 33(1), 61-70

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK: The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. New York: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education & Routledge.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-18

Larsen-Freeman, D & Anderson, M (2011). Techiques & Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press

Mardalis, (2008). Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Prosa. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Sociocollaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M.Warschauser & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

National Research Council Committee on Information Technology Literacy. (1999). Being fluent with information technology literacy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Northon, L. S (2009). Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge. ISBN 0-203-87043-3 Master e-book ISBN

Patton, M.Q., & Cochran, M (2002). A Guide to Using Qualitative Research Methodology. Medicins Sans Frontieres.

Robinson, S.P (2010). 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Education Preparation. AACTE, 11.
Schmidt, Baran, Thompson, et al (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). U.S. & Canada.

Shafer, K. G. (2008). Learning to teach with technology through an apprenticeship model. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 8(1), 27-44.

Shulman, L.S (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4-14

Simon, H. (1969). Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.

Sugiono, 2005. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wiley, J & Sons (2015). The Jossey-Bass Education Series. Jossey-Bass. USA

Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher Preparation Research: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations. East Lansing: MSU.

Yeh, A., (2005). Poetry from the heart. English Today, 21(1), 45-51

Zainal, A (2012). ESL teachers’ use of ICT in teaching English literature: An analysis of teachers’ TPCK. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 34,234 – 237

Downloads

Published

2018-09-28

How to Cite

Abidah, W. ., Suhatmady, B. ., & Limbong, E. . (2018). The TPACK Framework On Teacher’s Classroom Activity at Ma’Had Tahfidzul Qur’an Rahmatullah Samarinda . E3L: Journal of English Teaching, Linguistic, and Literature, 1(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.30872/e3l.v1i2.2028

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>