Maksim Sopan Santun Pada Pembelajaran Online Sekolah Dasar 013 Gotong Royong Kota Samarinda

Main Article Content

Siti Suryani
Yusak Hudiyono
Jaka Farih Agustian

Abstract

This study aims to describe the forms of maxims, obedience to maxims, and violation of the maxims of politeness in online learning at SD N 013 gotong royong, Samarinda city, which aims to describe pragmatic research studies. The research subject is online learning. The object of research is the observance of the maxim of politeness and the violation of the maxim of politeness in online learning that takes place at school. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive method. Techniques Data collection is done by observing methods. The data analysis technique is to clarify and classify the data. The results showed that there were 35 utterances of teachers and students in online learning at SD Negeri 013 gotong royong in the city of Samarinda which were identified as forms of politeness maxims. 27 utterances of obedience to the maxim of politeness, and 8 utterances of violation of the maxim of politeness to teachers and students. The data on compliance with maxims and violations consist of four utterances of obedience to the maxim of wisdom and two utterances of violation of the maxim of wisdom. Three utterances of obedience to the maxim of generosity and one utterance of violation of the maxim of generosity. Five utterances of respecting the maxim of respect and no utterances of violation of the maxim of appreciation. There are four utterances of obeying the maxim of simplicity and four utterances of violating the maxim of simplicity. Six utterances of compliance with the maxim of consensus and one utterance of violation of the maxim of consensus. Five utterances of compliance maxim of sympathy and no utterances of violation of maxim of sympathy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suryani, S., Hudiyono, Y., & Agustian, J. F. (2018). Maksim Sopan Santun Pada Pembelajaran Online Sekolah Dasar 013 Gotong Royong Kota Samarinda. Adjektiva: Educational Languages and Literature Studies, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.30872/adjektiva.v1i1.824
Section
Articles

References

Afandi Muhammad, Badarudin. 2011. PERENCANAAN PEMBELAJARAN SEKOLAH DASAR: Dengan Memasukkan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Bafadal, Ibrahim. 2004. Manajemen Perlengkapan sekolah Teori dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Chaer, Abdul, dkk. 2010. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
------------------------.2004. Sosiolinguistik Pengenalan Awal. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Djajasudarma, Fatimah. 2012. Wacana dan Pragmatik. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
------------------------. 1993. Metode Linguistik. Bandung: Eresco.
------------------------.1994. Pragmatik Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Jogiyanto. 2007. Pembelajaran Metode Kasus. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia
Musaba, Zulkifli, H. 2012. TERAMPIL BERBICARA Teori dan Pedoman Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: CV. ASWAJA PRESSINDO.
Mulyati, Yeti, dkk. 2008. Bahasa Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan: CV. Karya Indonesia.
Maleong, Lexy J. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda karya.
----------------------.2008. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif; Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda karya.
Mahsun, M.S. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa Tahapan Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Nadar, F.X. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Pangaribuan, Tegor. 2008. Paradigma Bahasa.Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Rahardi, Kunjana. 2005. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
----------------------.2009. Sosioprakmatik. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.
Rohmadi. 2010. Pragmatik Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Lingkar Media Jogja.
Rustono.1999. Pokok-pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: CV IKIP Semarang Press.
Rustaman, N. 2001. Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Imperial Bhakti Utama.
Suwito. 1983. Pengantar Awal Sosiolinguistik: Teori dan Problema. Jakarta: Kenari Offset.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu dan Muhammad Rohmadi. 2009. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik; Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
---------------------. 2010. Sosiolinguistik Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Zamzani, Musfiroh Tadkiroatun, dkk. 2011. Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kesantunan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Interaksi Sosial Bersemuka. LITERA, Volume 10, Nomor 1, April 2011, 35-50.
Silalahi, Puspa Rinda. 2012. Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa di Lingkungan Sekolah SMP Negeri 5 Binjai. Jurnal Sasindo, Vol 1, No 2.
Marina Siti M, Dian Eka Chandra W, Ayu Wulan D. (2017). Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Pada Kegiatan Pembelajaran Kelas VIII E SMPN Kota Bengkulu Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Korpus.
Gustiani. 2012. Kesantunan Berbahasa Guru Bahasa Indonesia dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar di SMA Negeri 2 Lintau Buo. Jurnal Kesantunan Berbahasa Guru Bahasa Indonesia dalam – PBM.
Tussolekha, R., Karomani, & Rusminto, N. E. (2014). Prinsip Kerja Sama dan Sopan Santun Siswa di Jejaring Facebook dan Implikasinya. J-Simbol (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 0–9.