Peer Review Process

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The Peer-Review Process in this journal is first carried out with an initial review from the editor to meet the requirements according to the writing rules (Author Guidelines). Furthermore, the review process is carried out by reviewers who are tasked with reviewing and assessing the substance of the article, assisting authors through comments and input both related to the state of the arts and other relevant substance components. The review process is carried out using a double blind review with 2 (two) reviewers who are in accordance with their fields of science. The ethical review process is carried out for the substance of the article, criticism and input are carried out objectively. Reviewers present views and input clearly supported by clear arguments. Criticism of the author's personality is an unethical act and is inappropriate for reviewers to do during the review process in this journal. Reviewers are also tasked with identifying relevant reading sources or study results that have not been cited by the author. After that, the Reviewer provides a recommendation which then the Editor In Chief will decide to accept or reject the journal article by considering the suggestions from the reviewers.