Pola Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Dosen dalam Umpan Balik Presentasi Mahasiswa: Kajian Pragmatik pada Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia

Authors

  • Septi Kartika Sari STKIP Muhammadiyah Lumajang
  • Sujarno STKIP Muhammadiyah Lumajang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/adjektiva.v9i1.6625

Keywords:

illocutionary speech acts, feedback, pragmatics, classroom interaction

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types of lecturers’ illocutionary speech acts and identify the dominant speech act patterns in feedback during student presentations in the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program. The research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive-interpretative design. The data consisted of lecturers’ spoken utterances during feedback sessions, collected through non-participant observation, audio recording, verbatim transcription, and documentation. Data analysis was conducted through utterance segmentation, illocutionary coding based on Searle’s classification, frequency calculation, and speech act pattern identification. The findings revealed five types of illocutionary speech acts used by lecturers, namely directive, representative, declarative, expressive, and commissive acts. Directive speech acts were the most dominant type, accounting for 44.44%, followed by representative acts (29.63%), declarative acts (14.81%), expressive acts (7.41%), and commissive acts (3.70%). The dominance of directive speech acts indicates that lecturers’ feedback was primarily aimed at encouraging student participation, responses, and reflective thinking processes. In addition, two main sequential patterns were identified, namely the expressive–directive pattern characterized as appreciative-corrective and the representative–directive–expressive pattern characterized as clarification-reinforcement. These findings demonstrate that lecturers’ feedback functions not only as academic evaluation but also as a pedagogical strategy that fosters communicative, dialogic, and reflective classroom interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Elyza, F., Triastuti, A., & Dini Meutia, P. (2023). STRATEGI UMPAN BALIK LANGSUNG TERHADAP MAHASISWA; POTRET PADA KELAS MENULIS BAHASA ASING. Journal of Language, Literature, and Linguistics, 3(1), 2023. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/wahanaliterasi

Lutfiana, M., & Sari, F. (2021). TINDAK TUTUR REPRESENTATIF DAN DIREKTIF DALAM LIRIK LAGU DIDI KEMPOT. Jurnal Diwangkara, 1(1), 26–35.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purba, A. (2011). TINDAK TUTUR DAN PERISTIWA TUTUR. Pena, 1(1), 77–91.

Saleh, F., Yusuf, R., Rosvita, I., & Ibrahim, I. (2024). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Menurut Searle Pada Interaksi Pembelajaran Siswa SMA 2 Sidenreng Rappang. Qalam, 12(1), 49–56.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. In https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213. Cambridge University Press.

Siswana. (2023). TINDAK TUTUR DALAM PEMBERIAN UMPAN BALIK LISAN PADA PENULISAN SKRIPSI. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suri, N. K., Noviyanti, S., & Agustna, A. (2025). Teori Pragmatika Bahasa dan Kesantunan Berbahasa. Journal on Education, 7, 10107–10116.

Uswatun Hasanah, Neni Afrida Sari, & Rahmad Husein. (2024). Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) Pattern of Sinclair and Coulthard Model In English Classroom Interaction. Sintaksis : Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 2(5), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v2i5.1102

Downloads

Published

2026-06-24

How to Cite

Sari, S. K., & Sujarno. (2026). Pola Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Dosen dalam Umpan Balik Presentasi Mahasiswa: Kajian Pragmatik pada Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Adjektiva: Educational Languages and Literature Studies, 9(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.30872/adjektiva.v9i1.6625

Issue

Section

Articles