Metacognitive Strategies for Enhancing Literal Reading Comprehension in ESP among Indonesian Civic Education Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/adjektiva.v9i1.6534Keywords:
metacognitive reading strategies, literal reading comprehension, English for Specific Purposes (ESP), civic educationAbstract
This quasi-experimental study examined whether explicit instruction in metacognitive reading strategies improves literal reading comprehension among Indonesian ESP learners. Eighty-five second-semester civic education students at the State University of Makassar participated in either an experimental group (n=43) receiving four sessions of planning, monitoring, and evaluating strategy instruction or a control group (n=42) receiving conventional instruction without metacognitive training. Both groups completed parallel pretests and posttests of literal comprehension using authentic ESP texts on human rights and government structures. ANCOVA results revealed a significant main effect of the intervention, F(1,82)=8.94, p=.004, with a medium-to-large effect size (Cohen's d=0.68). While the control group gained 4 points (76 to 80), the experimental group improved by 10 points (75 to 85). Findings demonstrate that explicit metacognitive strategy instruction significantly enhances ESP students' ability to locate and recall explicitly stated information. The study contributes empirical evidence from the under-researched Indonesian civic education ESP context and suggests that embedding low-cost, high-impact metacognitive practices into early-semester ESP courses can transform passive reading into active, self-regulated comprehension.
Downloads
References
Adys, H. P., Adys, H. P., & Usman, M. (2025). Enhancing ESP Reading Comprehension through Context Clues and Digital Strategies. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 5(02), 742-752.
Amini, D., Anhari, M. H., & Ghasemzadeh, A. (2020). Modeling the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness, self-regulation and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), Article 1787018. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787018
Cervantes, F., et al. (2025). Metacognitive strategies in English as a foreign language learning in higher education: A literature review. Revista Espacios, 46(5), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a25v46n05p23
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Deliany, Z. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan, 7(2), 45–58.
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
Gamboa Serrano, C. U. (2020). Metacognitive strategies for improving students' reading skills. Península, 15(2), 99–115. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1870-57662020000200099&script=sci_abstract
Ghaith, G. M. (2020). Foreign language reading anxiety and metacognitive strategies in undergraduates' reading comprehension. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1310–1328.
Ghaith, G., & El Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 1–24.
Hamiddin, H., & Saukah, A. (2020). Investigating metacognitive knowledge in reading comprehension: The case of Indonesian undergraduate students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 608–615.
Hassan, M., Najat, M., & Bouchaib, B. (2025). Rethinking cross-linguistic transfer of metacognitive reading strategies: A quasi-experimental study among Moroccan university ESP students. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(6).
Lai, C., & Leung, A. (2025). Pretest-posttest control group designs in language intervention research. Applied Linguistics Review, 16(2), 301–325.
Maftoon, P., & Alamdari, E. F. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness raising on reading comprehension. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(1), 27–49.
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI-R) and testing for factorial invariance. Reading Psychology, 39(5), 453–479.
Sukirlan, M., Raja, P., Setiyadi, A. B., & Agustin, F. (2020). Developing strategy use and language performance through implicit strategy training. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 8(2), 191–201. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/19605/
Suwono, H. (2023). Quasi-experimental designs in Indonesian educational research: A methodological review. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 12(1), 88–104.
Zare, M., & Babapour, M. (2022). The effect of strategy-based methods vs. translation-based method on general English and ESP reading comprehension of Iranian university students. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(4), 75–92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Himala Praptami Adys, Himaya Praptani Adys

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













