Comparison of cell disruption methods for improving lipid extraction from Porphyridium cruentum

  • Pintaka Kusumanintyas Program Magister Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman
  • Muhammad Nashir Program Studi Sarjana Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman
  • Maria Emilia Inda Program Studi Sarjana Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman
  • Anggun Noor Kurnia Sari Program Studi Sarjana Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman
  • Mery Fazria Setya Rahayu Program Studi Sarjana Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman
  • Marselina Dau Program Studi Sarjana Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/bcsj.v4i1.729
Keywords: cells disruption method, extraction, lipids, Porphyridium cruentum

Abstract

Cell disruption and extraction processes are very important downstream processing steps in microalgae-based in industrial bioprocesses. Each type of microalgae has a varied cell wall structure, so it is necessary to optimize an effective and economical cell disruption method to maximize the extraction process. This study aimed to evaluate several cell disruption methods, including: osmotic shock method (NaCl 20% w/v), acid method (HCl 3M), and microwave (450W, 5 min) for lipid extraction for Porphyridium cruentum biomass. Lipid extraction was carried out using n-hexane as solvent. Among several tested methods, the highest yield of lipid extraction was obtained by using acid method (8.15 ± 0.12% w/w), while the microwave method only produced lipids of 2.79 ± 0.37% w/w, and the lowest yield was obtained by using osmotic shock (1.07 ± 0.44 % w/w). The acid method is a very simple method for disruption of P. cruentum cells, because it does not involve the use of expensive equipment. Therefore, this method is considered efficient and economical for use in the extraction process of lipid or other biomolecule compounds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Byreddy, A.R., Gupta, A., Barrow, C.J., & Puri, M. (2015). Comparison of cell disrution methods for improving lipid extraction from Thraustochytrid Strains. Mar. Drugs, 13(8), 5116. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13085111.

Chisti, Y. (2007). Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotech adv., 25(3), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001.

Gujar, A., Cui, H., Ji, C., Kubar, S., & Li, R. (2019). Development, production and market value of microalgae products. Applied Microbiology Open Access, 5(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.35248/2471-9315.19.5. 162.

Lee, J.-Y., Yoo, C., Jun,S.-Y., Ahn, C.-Y., & Oh, H.-M. (2010). Comparison of several methods for effective lipid extraction from microalgae. Bioresour. Technol., 101(1), 75-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.058.

Laurens, L.M.L., Nagle, N., Davis, S., Sweeney, N., van Wychen, S., Lowell, A., & Pienkos, P.T. (2015). Acid-catalyzed algal biomass pretreatment for integrated lipid and carbohydrate-based biofuels production. Green Chem., 17(2), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC01612B.

Magota, A., Saga, K., Atobe, S., & Imou, K. (2012). Effect of thermal pretreatments on hydrocarbon recovery from Botryococcus braunii. Bioresource Technology, 123, 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.095.

Purwanti, A. (2014). Pengambilan lipid dari mikroalga basah dengan cara ekstraksi dalam autoklaf. ST AKPRIND Yogyakarta.

Rakesh, S., Dhar, D.W., Prasanna, R., Saxena, A.K., Saha, S., Shikla, M., & Sharma, K. (2015). Cell disruption methods for improving lipid extraction efficiency in unicellular microalgae. Eng. Life Sci., 14(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201400222.

Ramola, B., Kumar, V., Nanada, M., Mishra, Y., Tyagi, T., Gupta, A., & Sharma, N. (2019). Evaluation, comparison of different solvent extraction, cell disruption methods and hydrothermal liquefaction of Oedogonium macroalgae for biofuel production. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) (22), e00340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00340.

Foo, S.C., Yusoff, F, Md., Ismail, M., Basri, M., Chan, K.W., Khong, N.M.H., & Yau, S.K. (2015). Production of fucoxanthin-rich fraction (FxRF) from a diatom, Chaetoceros calcitrans (Paulsen) Takano 1968. Algal Research, 12, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.004.

Setyaningsih, I., Salamah, E., & Rahman, D.A. (2013). Komposisi kimia dan aktivitas antihiperglikemik biomassa dan polisakarida ekstraseluler dari mikroalga Porphyridium cruentum. Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia, 16(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v16i1.7777.

Singh, N.K. & Dhar, D.W. (2011). Microalgae as second generation biofuel. A review. Agron Sustain Develop, 31(4), 605–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0018-0.

Wang, D., Li, Y., Hu, X., Su, W., & Zhong, M. (2015). Combined enzymatic and mechanical cell disruption and lipid extraction of green alga Neochloris oleoabundans. Int. J. Mol. Sci, 16(4), 7707-7722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047707.

Published
2021-05-31
How to Cite
Kusumanintyas, P., Nashir, M., Inda, M. E., Sari, A. N. K., Rahayu, M. F. S., & Dau, M. (2021). Comparison of cell disruption methods for improving lipid extraction from Porphyridium cruentum. Bivalen: Chemical Studies Journal, 4(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.30872/bcsj.v4i1.729
Issue
Vol 4 No 1 (2021)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2021 Pintaka Kusumaningtyas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The author retains the copyright and grants the journal right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  2. The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work

Most read articles by the same author(s)