An Investigation of Teaching English Grammar through Distance Learning at SMAN 1 Samarinda

  • Agitha Martha Laura Mulawarman University
  • Weningtyas Parama Iswari Mulawarman University
  • Maria Teodora Ping Mulawarman University
Keywords: Teaching English Grammar, Teaching Problems, Distance Learning

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to know how the teacher teaches English grammar through distance learning and investigate the problems during implementation of teaching English grammar through distance learning. The design of this study was qualitative research design which was characterized by a case study. The participant was selected through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed by using the interactive analysis model. The researcher used the triangulation by data source, triangulation by method, and triangulation by theory to check the validity and reliability of this study. The findings revealed that the English teacher applied teaching grammar in context, inductive and deductive approach and integrated grammar with language skills. In addition, the English teacher used flipped-classroom model a form of blended learning that combines synchronous and asynchronous online learning with WhatsApp, Google Meet, and Google Classroom as the teaching platforms. In its implementation, the English teacher faced some problems in the process of teaching English grammar through distance learning. Those problems were student discipline, limited time, teacher’s extra workload, distance between teacher and students, classroom management and technical problem. In conclusion, teaching English Grammar through distance learning can be conducted and maximized by having well preparation on learning activities, well communication and collaboration between the teacher and students in teaching ang learning process to achieve the learning objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bikowski, D. (2018). Technology for teaching grammar. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar An SLA Perspective.

Erkulova, F., Samandarov, U., Samandarova, G. (2020). The use of ICT in teaching English grammar in secondary schools. International Journal on Integrated Education, Vol. 3, Issue I.

Ewing, R., Lowrie, T., & Higgs, J. (2010). (Eds.). Teaching and communicating:Rethinking professional experiences. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Freeman, L. & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques & principles in language teaching: 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press.

Guth, S., & Petrucco, C. (2008). Social software and language acquisition. In de Cássia Veiga
Marriott, R., & Lupion Torres, P. (eds.), Handbook of Research on E-Learning Methodologies for Language Acquisition (pp. 424–442). UK, Idea Group Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-159904-994-6.ch026

Hrastinski, Stefan. 2008. ‘Asynchronous & Synchronous E-Learning.’ EDUCAUSE Quarterly 31 (4): 51–55.
Jacob, S., & Radhai, S. (2016). Trends in ICT e-learning: Challenges and Rxpectations. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 5 (2), 196-201.
Josep, J. (2006). Question answer relationships in teaching English for Second Language. Mogaya: Jamaica Publisher of Human Being Association Donation for Language Learner.

Levy, S. (2003). Six factors to consider when planning online distance learning programs in Higher Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, VI (1).
Levin, J., & Nolan, F. (2004). Principles of classroom management: A professional decision-making model. Boston: Pearson.
Lewis, L. L., Kim, Y. A., & Ashby B, J. (2011). Teaching practices and strategies to involve inner-city parents at home and in the school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.005.
MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, Wellbeing and Negative Emotions. System, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102352
McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001) Research Education: A conceptual introduction. 5th Edition. New York City, NY: Longman

Memari, M. (2020). Synchronous and asynchronous electronic learning and EFL learners’ learning of grammar. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, vol. 12 no.2, pp.89-114. Doi: 10.22111/IJALS.2020.6043

Nugroho, A., Ilmiani, D., & Rekha, A. (2020). EFL Teachers’ Challenges and Insights of Online Teaching amidst Global Pandemic. Metathesis: Journal of English language literature and teaching. Vol.4, no 3, PP 277-291. DOI: 10.31002/metathesis.v4i3.3195

Nunan, D. (2005). The practice of English language teaching: Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, Summer 1991, pp. 279-95.

Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Richards, J. C. & Reppen, R. (2014). Towards a pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal, Vol. 45 (1) 5-25. DOI: 10.1177/0033688214522622

Riddell, D. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language. London: Hodder Education.

Sadeghi, M. A. (2019). Shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. Int. J. Res. Engl. Educ. Vol. 4, 80–88.
Samieva, S. N. (2020). Working on the txt as one of the ways to overcome difficulties in the process of teaching grammar of a foreign language. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences. Vol. 8 No. 3. Part II ISSN 2056-585

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston: Pearson.

Sharaf, S.R. 2011. The effect of teaching grammar in writing contexts to enhance using grammar functionally for eleventh graders in Gaza Governorate. (Unpublished Thesis. Al-Azhar University: Gaza).
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage: 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press.
Sun, X., Zou, J., Li, L., & Luo, M. (2020). A Blockchain-Based Online Language Learning System. Telecommunication Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-020-00699-1
Tabak, F., & Rampal, R. (2014). Synchronous E-learning: Reflections and design considerations. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 10(4), 80–92. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/include/getdoc.php?id=6179&article=1793&mode=pdf.

Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning: Predictions and possibilities. Educ. Sci, 8(1), 35 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035


Whyldeck, K. (2003). Everyday spelling and grammar. Sydney, NSW: Pascal Press.

Wesche, M., and Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative teaching, content-based instruction, and task-based learning, In Handbook of applied linguistics, ed.,R. Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Watkins, R. (2005). 75 E-learning Activities: Making Online Learning Interactive. San Francisco : Pfeiffer.

Yamagata-lynch, L. C. (2020). View of blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 15(2). http://www.irrodl.org/article/view/1778/2837

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Published
2021-11-30
How to Cite
Laura, A. M., Iswari, W. P., & Ping, M. T. (2021). An Investigation of Teaching English Grammar through Distance Learning at SMAN 1 Samarinda. Educational Studies: Conference Series, 1(1), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.30872/escs.v1i1.858
Section
Articles