Reading Research Journal Articles in an EFL context: A Pilot Study on Confidence and Difficulty
Abstract
This study is based on previous research that compared to textbooks, students find both the style and the level of writing of empirical articles such as research journal articles is difficult to understand. The stages of reading the journal articles are complex. Moreover, there are more studies found in sciences resulted various difficulties but limited research in a foreign language context as the journal articles are written in English. Therefore, there needs an investigation the complexity of reading journal articles to provide some way out to lessen the challenges. As a pilot study for further investigation, a questionnaire was delivered online using google form to 28 students enrolled in the courses of Advanced Reading and Advanced Writing, aged 19-22. They learn to read journal articles in the courses. The given questionnaire consisted of two sections; students self-rated confidence (adapted from Sego and Stuart, 2015) and difficulties in reading comprehension of journal articles (adopted from Chen, 2017). Using simple descriptive statistics, the results revealed that the students have three most major difficulties in reading journal articles, namely short attention span, having a problem understanding the main points, and Limited semantic knowledge (professional terms). They also have three main least challenges; do not know where to start reading, do not understand the tables, charts or statistics, memory failure. The students have the highest confidence in their ability to read and understand the content, however they have the least confidence in their abilities to write coherent summaries of journal articles. The findings imply that the students need to have more time to familiarize themselves with characteristics and construction of journal articles including what should be written in each section of the paper such as introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, and implication and limitation of the study.
Downloads
References
Ali, Z. (2023). A Study of the Relationship between Critical Reading and Critical Thinking Abilities of Undergraduate Learners Examining Elementary School Teachers’ Professional Proficiencies With Technology Integration And Their Impact On Students’ Achievement View proj. 7(4), 1639–1647. http://journalppw.com
Bachiochi, P., Everton, W., Evans, M., Fugere, M., Escoto, C., Letterman, M., & Leszczynski, J. (2011). Using Empirical Article Analysis to Assess Research Methods Courses. Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310387787
Carkenord, D. M. (1994). Motivating Students to Read Journal Articles. Teaching of Psychology, 21(3), 162–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862839402100309
Gao, Q., Wang, H., Chang, F., An, Q., Yi, H., Kenny, K., & Shi, Y. (2022). Feeling bad and doing bad: student confidence in reading in rural China. Compare, 52(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1759027
Gedik, O., & Akyol, H. (2022). Reading Difficulty and Development of Fluent Reading Skills: An Action Research. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 2022. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.2
Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011). The C.R.E.A.T.E. Approach to Primary Literature Shifts Undergraduates’ Self-Assessed Ability to Read and Analyze Journal Articles, Attitudes about Science, and Epistemological Beliefs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
Hubbard, K. E., Dunbar, S. D., Peasland, E. L., Poon, J., & Solly, J. E. (2022). How do readers at different career stages approach reading a scientific research paper? A case study in the biological sciences. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 12(4), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2078010
Melero, Á., Villalón, R., & Izquierdo-Magaldi, B. (2020). Attitudes toward reading, reading self-confidence, family involvement and reading comprehension in the second grade. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18(50), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.25115/EJREP.V18I50.2780
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the Gap Between the Language of Science and the Language of School Science Through the Use of Adapted Primary Literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9111-z
Round, J. E., & Campbell, A. M. (2013). Figure Facts: Encouraging Undergraduates to Take a Data-Centered Approach to Reading Primary Literature. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0057
Sego, S. A., & Stuart, A. E. (2015). Learning to Read Empirical Articles in General Psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620875
Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L. (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings, 61(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910932267
Copyright (c) 2023 Ichi Ahada, Dyah Sunggingwati, Susilo Susilo, Dea Rini Setyowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
