Main Article Content

Abstract

This article discusses about assessment of the constructivism approach in history learning with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). CDA provides a set of in-depth analysis method which includes the realm of linguistic, social, and cultural. The CDA is composed of three stages of a dynamic analysis and related to each other: (1) analysis of the text, (2) analysis of the practice of discourse, and (3) analysis of social practices. In the context of history learning with constructivism approach, the third stages can be used to assess the development of the system and the structure of the thinking of learners. CDA approach can be used to analyse the work of learners with description test. Therefore, the necessary rubric based on assessment rubrics and discourse analysis of the level of development of thinking learners. Based on the research results, the CDA can be used in learning history, specifically with constructivism approach. Assessment of history learning with constructivism approach is expected to be an alternative assessment of learning that not only assess student knowledge of quantity, but also to measure the development of the system and the structure of the thinking of learners.  

Keywords

assessment constructivist of learning histroy critical discourse analysis

Article Details

How to Cite
Abidin, N. F., Joebagio, H., & Sariyatun, S. (1). Penilaian Pembelajaran Sejarah Konstruktivistik: Pendekatan Critical Discourse Analysis. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 1(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.30872/yupa.v1i1.87

References

  1. Anderson, L.W. dan Krathwolh, D. 2015. Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Assesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  2. Bloom, B. 1965, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company
  3. Budiyono. 2015. Pengantar Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: UNS Press
  4. Carr, E.H. 2008. Apa itu Sejarah? Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu
  5. Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. Essex: Longman Group
  6. Fairclough. 1993. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press
  7. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books
  8. Gillis, J.R. 1996. Commemorations: The Politics of Nation Identity. New Jersey: Priceton University Press
  9. Gottschalk, L. 2008. Mengerti Sejarah, Jakarta: UI Press
  10. Ibrahim, A. S. 2009. Metode Analisis Teks & Wacana. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  11. Illeris, K. 2011. Contemporary Theories of Learning: Teori-teori Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Bandung: Nusa Media
  12. Johnson, D.W. dan Johnson, R.T. 2002. Meaningful Assesment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
  13. Kuntowijoyo. 2013. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana
  14. Kristeva, J. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Columbia University Press
  15. Muijs dan Reynold. 2008. Effective Teachng: Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  16. Popham, W. 1995. Classroom Assesment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
  17. Reynold, C.R., Livingstone, R. B., dan Wilson, V. 2010. Measurement and Assesment in Education: Second Edition. London: Pearson
  18. Education Rogers, R. 2004, An Introduction: Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  19. Schunk, D. E. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  20. Suharsimi, A. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi
  21. Aksara
  22. Suparman, A. 2012. Desain Instruksional Modern: Panduan Para Pengajar dan Inovator Pendidikan. Jakarta: Erlangga
  23. Walshaw, M. 2007. Working with Foucault in Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
  24. Widoyoko, E. P. 2014, Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Most read articles by the same author(s)